Automation without the scripting or the wait.
Legacy RPA takes weeks and breaks on every screen change. Ballet ships the automation in hours, in plain language, and keeps it running when your systems change.
Legacy RPA takes weeks and breaks on every screen change. Ballet ships the automation in hours, in plain language, and keeps it running when your systems change.
Ballet replaces scripted bots, not your team. You describe the outcome; it reasons through the judgment steps, runs reliably, and adapts when a screen or system changes.
| | UiPath | |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Deterministic workflows + agents, written as code | Visual RPA, recorded steps and scripting |
| New integration | Generated on demand against any API | Custom scripting, weeks per build |
| Complex multi-system work | Scales, written as code | Possible, but slow and brittle |
| Output when it matters | Deterministic, agentic where it help | Deterministic, breaks on UI change |
| Breakage | Evals on every step, auto-patched with a diff | Breaks when a screen or system changes |
| Review & version control | Generated code, version-controlled | After-the-fact auditing, bolt-on |
| Time to first workflow | 30 minutes | 2 to 4 weeks |
For the cross-system automation teams get stuck on: yes, without scripting or weeks per bot.
No. Keep what works and bring Ballet in for the automations that are slow to build or break on every change
Yes where it matters, with agentic reasoning where judgment is needed, and it adapts instead of breaking on UI changes.
Generated, version-controlled code with run history and evals on every step, not after-the-fact auditing.
A 30-minute working session on your real systems. No SOW.