Glue code your team never has to own
Generated connectors against any API — SAP, internal ERPs, legacy supply-chain tools. No hand-rolled clients, no connector maintenance rota.
Typical backlog age before Ballet: 3 quarters.
Every quarter, glue work eats engineering capacity: one-off connectors, brittle scripts, no-code sprawl nobody can audit. Ballet generates each workflow as code your engineers review and your security team approves — so integrations ship in days without pulling anyone off the product.
Ballet doesn't replace your engineers — it replaces the glue work that steals their quarters. Your team briefs Ballet in plain English; Ballet writes the integration as deterministic, version-controlled code; your engineers review the diff; your security team approves the run. The platform stays yours. The backlog finally moves.
The tickets that sit for quarters because they're cross-system, fiddly, and never quite P0. Ballet ships them in days — as code your team reviews.
Generated connectors against any API — SAP, internal ERPs, legacy supply-chain tools. No hand-rolled clients, no connector maintenance rota.
Typical backlog age before Ballet: 3 quarters.
Salesforce + Stripe + Okta + product DB + Zendesk, shipped as one reviewable workflow instead of five brittle scripts.
Engineer-time to review: under an hour.
SSO + billing + seats + data export + finance ledger + CSM notify. Every run replayable, backed by Brainfish's SOC2 Type II compliance.
Audit prep drops from days to a query.
Replace one-off scripts with evaluated workflows. When an upstream API changes, Ballet catches it and shows your team the diff — before the pager goes off.
Silent breakage caught by evals, not customers.
| | In-house build | n8n / Zapier | Task agents | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Deterministic workflows + agents, written as code | Hand-rolled services & scripts | Preset workflows | Task-based agents |
| Engineering time per integration | Minutes — review a diff | Weeks per integration | Days of canvas-building | Fast start, slow to ship |
| Code review & version control | Yes — generated code, PR-style diffs | Yes | Visual graph / JSON export | No |
| Security approval gates | First-class | Custom-built each time | Limited | No |
| Breakage handling | Evals on every step; auto-patched with a diff | Pager duty | Breaks silently when an API changes | Varies between runs |
| Time to first workflow | 30 minutes | A sprint or more | Hours–days | Fast start, slow to ship |
Yes. Every workflow is generated as version-controlled code your team reviews and approves, diff by diff. Nothing ships without sign-off, and the platform stays yours.
Generated workflows arrive as reviewable diffs, like any PR. Approval gates are first-class, every run is replayable, and audit logs export cleanly — so Ballet slots into the review and compliance process you already run.
Generated code is visible and version-controlled. Every run is replayable. Approval gates are first-class. Ballet is part of Brainfish and covered by Brainfish's SOC2 Type II compliance. Details are in our Trust Center. SSO/SAML at Enterprise.
Those tools cap out at their connector library, and the visual graph becomes unauditable as it grows. Ballet writes the connector you need on demand, and the workflow runs as deterministic code your engineers can actually review.
Task agents vary between runs — fine for research, unacceptable for billing and identity workflows. Ballet writes deterministic workflows as code, with agentic reasoning only where it helps. Code you can read. Runs you can replay.
Any system with an API. We've shipped against SAP, internal ERPs, legacy supply-chain tools. Systems without APIs aren't us.
Most design-partner workflows ship within two weeks of the initial review. The integration is generated in minutes; the bulk of the time is your team scoping and approving.
No SOW. No scope creep. Your engineers review every line.